
I define war as a conflict carried on by force of arms. The hostility may be between nations or groups. Both sides use weapons and battles take place on land, sea or in the air. Violence, injury, and killing are used to settle the dispute.
What are the characteristics of war?
This list explains the important characteristics of war. First,
war involves struggle and conflict between nations, organizations, or large
groups of people.. Second, the combatants use physical and violent force .
Third, the big issue of war is governance in a territory that determines "who
gets power, who gets wealth and resources, whose ideals prevail, who is a
member or not, (and) which laws get made" ("War"). Fourth,
the antagonists of the war perceive each other as an enemy. The actors are
hostile and show hatred toward the other. Each side has an opposing military
force that seeks to harm, injure, and even kill the enemy.
Nicholos Timasheff, a sociologist, explained the three essential conditions
needed for war. First is "a cultural tradition of war" that believes
war is useful for resolving conflicts. Second is "an antagonist situation"
in which the states have incompatible goals. Third is "fuel that ignites
the timber" that encourages the nation to engage in war. He found seven
fuels that explode in war:" (1) Get revenge (to settle'old scores' from
previous conflicts), (2) Dictate one's will to a weaker nation, (3) Power
to enhance prestige (to save another nation's 'honor,' (4) Unite rival groups
within one's country, (5) Protect or exalt the nation's leader, (6) Satisfy
the national aspirations of ethnic groups(to bring 'our people who are living
in another country into our borders), (7) Convert others to religious and
ideological beliefs" (Henslin 511).
What are the two types of war?
The two types of war are hot war and cold war.
Hot war is a condition of mutual hostility, active engagement of militaries, and the use of weapons such as missiles, bombs, and soldiers in combat. The goals may be either destruction or surrender of the enemy. Nationalism predominates . the purpose is to produce a winner and a loser.
Cold War takes place in an environment of mutual hostility. There is very little actual engagement. The prevailing conditions include propaganda, arms races, and military preparation for war. Ideology and nationalism predominate. The aim is stalemate, where neither side initiates aggression and war. Both sides fear an overwhelming retaliatory total destructive response (Sandy and Perkins).
Works Cited
Henslin, James. Social Problems. Upper Sattle Rivers: Prentice Halls. 2003. Sixth Edition.
Sandy, Leo and Perkins, Ray. "The Nature Of Peace And Its Implications For Peace Education".oz..lymouth.edu. 10 Apr 2006. http://oz.plymouth,edu/~lsandy/peacedef.html
"War." Stanford Encyclopedia Dictionary. 2May 2006. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/war/
Ethical Issue of War

Source: The Ethics Of War and Peace. Google Images. www.amazon.com.
Two big questions:
War As Good and Beneficial
Only An Appearance! Not A Reality!
War can be perceived as a worthy good and a benefit for mankind. The student of peace presents the arguments why war may be perceived as good and beneficial. The sage teacher of peace explains why these arguments are defective and in actuality promote harm and bad outcomes.
"War Promotes Martial Virtues" Argument
Courage: A Virtue of War

Source: Google Image. www.iwojama.com
Student of Peace: War brings out the finest virtues in warriors. These excellences
include honor, nobility, courage, and self-sacriface. These virtues allow the
warrior to show his moral strength and apply these excellences to culture, society,
politics, and family. An article called "Arguments Defending War"
states, "An honorable warrior is expected to also be honorable in dealing
with people, a noble warrior is also noble in society and politics, and a warrior
who sacrifices for his comrades will also sacrifice for the benefit of society"
("Arguments Defending Society"). Benito Mussolini, The Fascist Dictator
of Italy during World War Two stated, "War alone brings up to their highest
all human energies and imposes the stamp of nobility upon the peoples who have
the courage to make it" ( Musssolini).
Sage Teacher of Peace: The path of the warrior is indeed a noble path. Bo! Bo! Bo!
"War Fosters Patriotism" Argument

Source: "Patriotism Is Making Sure Your..." Google Images. www.northernsun.com
Student: War promotes patriotism that involves loyalty to the nation, the regime in power, and its war policies. Patriotism also means love of the nation and a willingness to sacrifice including one's life. In the President Bush America patriotism means loyalty to the Administration and its Iraqi War. It also means support for soldiers who fight this war ("How To Win A Pro War Argument").
Sage Teacher:
"War Establishes Military Security and Credibility"
Argument

Source: "National Security Cartoons." Google Image. www.cartoonstock.com
Student: Military security makes a nation feel safe and protected from an outside attack or subversion within. President Bush claims his war on terrorism prevents secret attacks from Al Qaeda within the United and subversion by radical Islam (Henslin 516).
A successful war establishes the credibility of a nation. It shows a nation purses worthy values, inspires trust and confidence in other nations, and has effective military strength to achieve the ends of its policies. President Bush purpose ifor the Iraqi War is to prove that America has the credibility to promote democracy and freedom in the Middle East (Henslin 516).
A strong military prevents dangers from an attack and beleif the nation is safe from its enemies.
Sage Teacher:
"Leaders Do The Will of God In War"
Argument
Saint Tony Blair

Source: "for Tony and I am" Google Images. bigdaddymerk.blogspot.com
Student: Some political leaders believe that in fighting a particular war that they fulfill the will of God.
Tony Blair, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, believes that he is doing
God's will in the Iraqi War. Mr. Blair on an interview show hosted by Michael
Parkinson and broadcasted throughout the United Kingdom explained his decision
for entering the Iraqi War.
He said: "The decision has to taken and has to be lived with, and in the
end there is a judgment that - well, I think if you have faith about these things
then you realize that judgment is made by other people. If you believe in God,
it's made by God as well.".
Blair believes that he is on mission of God, and his decision will ultimately
be judged by God.
They believe a faculty of the mind allows the policy maker to communicate with God and know the will of God.
Sage Teacher:
"War Expresses The Will of God" Argument

Source: "In God We Trust" Google Images. www.afa.net
Student: War is the will of Divinity and Universal spirit, unfolds purpose of God in history, and is the basis for evolution of humanity ("Arguments Defending War"). William Burroughs, an American writer, states, "This is a war universe. War all the time. There may be other universes based on other principles, but ours seems to be based on war and games (Burroughs).
Sage Teacher:
"Holy Wars As Upholding God and His Religion"
Argument
"Whose Holy War?"

Source: "Whose Holy War?" Google Images. www.eye.net
Student: A holy war is fought in the name of a religion. It has these characteristics: (1) to defend or extend one's religion, (2) a moral and holy purpose, (3) a spiritual reward for participants, and (4) soldiers fight in battles because they believe God is on their side ("Holy Wars").
Some American leaders perceive the War on Terror as a Holy War. President Bush has described this war as a crusade against evil doers that include terrorist organization of Al Qaeda, and Islam nations of Saddam's Iraq, Iran, and Syria. He believes America is a Christian nation with a sacred mission to defend Israel and Judaic - Christian civilization. General William Boykin, a general of the Bush Administration, who views America in a holy war against radical Islam. He believes: The United States is a Judiac - Christian nation. Radical Islam is under the direction of the spiritual enemy of mankind, Satan. President Bush is appointed by God to be the leader and President of the United States. President Bush promoted Boykin to Deputy Under - Secretary of Defense for Intelligence ("Is Bush War on Evildoers a Holy Crusade?").
President Bush has turned to the crusading, bible belt Christians, as a major
faction of the Republican Party. They believe the Bush Administration should
be guided by the Christian biblical worldview. They support the United States
military policy for the Middle East (Phillips).
Radical Islam is fighting its own Jihad. Osama bi Laden is the leader of the
international terrorist network called al-Qaeda. This group is accused by the
United States Government for the attacks of September 11, 2001. Bin Laden and
radical Islam leaders hate America for these reasons as presented in the 1998
manifesto: (1) American troops in the Holy nation of Saudi Arabia, (2) United
States is an the main supporter of Zionist Israel, (3) United States military
presence in the Persian Gulf region, and (4) He regards many western institutions
as depraved such as pornography and erotica sex, coed schools, and democracy.
He presents this duty to all followers of Islam
"to kill Americans
and its allies, both civil and military, is an individual duty to every Moslem
who is able in any country, until their armies, shattered and broken - winged,
depart from lands of Islam" ("Osama bin Laden"). This jahid is
also presented as the defense of Islam, protecting the faith of Islam, and overthrowing
the oppression of American Imperialism ("Islam: Holy War").
Sage Teacher:
"Economic Benefits of War" Argument
War Prosperity

Source: "Prosperity." Google Images. regentprep.org
Student: These are economic benefits of war. It promotes prosperity, employment, and healthy, strong economy. Technology and industry flourish during wars. Without government military contracts the results would be serious unemployment and the closing of many businesses. The preparation for war and the fighting of wars brings substantial profits to corporations engaged in producing military goods ("Economic Benefits of War"). War is useful to end recessions, because it enhances employment and economic growth, and people make more purchases in the private economy (Moffat).
Sage Teacher:
"Scientific and Technological Benefits of War" Arguments

Source: "They seem to call this new war." Google Images"airebach.com
Student: War stimulates scientific research and technological development. In war nations are desperate for scientific development and new innovations. These inventions come from war: nuclear power that provides electricity, rockets that are used to travel in outer space, and smaller and faster boats that in the civilian economy are used for exploration and commerce ("Arguments Defending War").
Sage Teacher:
"Social Benefits of War" Argument
Student: War brings about these utilitarian results: First, It is a driving force for cultural development Second, wars of conquest produce empires that help the economy and expand the territory of a nation. Third , the military is an institution to rid the nation of "social misfits ("Arguments of War'). Fourth, wars bring about social integration. Nations are in danger fom inner conflicts and civil wars. War with enemies outside the nation gives the nation a common enemy that promotes cooperation and closes the ranks of feuding groups (Henslin 515).
Sage Teacher:
"Righteousness of Just War" Argument

Source:"Just War? William Rogel" Google Images www.yale,edu
Student: Just war is fought for morally right principles. Most scholars agree a just war needs to meet these four conditions: (1) The governing authority declares the war, (2) The war requires a just cause such as fighting an unprovoked attack , (3) The nation has right intentions such as fighting for justice, and (4) War is a last resort, because all peaceful options are exhausted ("War"). Harry Browne, the Libertarian candidate for President, claims most Americans consider World War II, this nation's one just war. Some of the reasons: The Japanese performed sneak and unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor. Britain appeased a ruthless dictator at Munich. Hitler sought to conquer Britain and all of Europe. If Germany and Japan had been victorious, Americans would be speaking German or Japanese, today. Americans were fighting for democracy and freedom. (Browne).
Sage Teacher:
"Noble Pax America" Argument

Source: "Pax America" Google Images. www.sp.nl
Student: The United States fulfills the worthy mission of Pax Americana.The United States the dominant superpower of our planet, crusades for freedom, democracy, and free enterprise. It fights for free speech, free elections of governmental officials, and owning one's own property. The United States fights oppression and tyranny in many nations. The United States is perceived as the new model for the Second Roman Empire. The advocates of Pax America believe that only America with great military strength and overwhelming economic and political influence, can promote free and open societies, global security, and planetary prosperity. The United States performs the role of world policeman. American War in Iraq is a fulfilling its global responsibility and proving to the world that the United States is the superpower of our world with the finest of ideals (Bookman)
Sage Teacher:
Works Cited
"Arguments Defending War." Agnoticism/Atheism. 24 Feb. 2006.http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/phil/blphil_eth_wardef.htm
"Backgroung Q&A: Osama bin Laden." Feb 2006. Council On Foreign
Relations
Bookman, Jay. "The President 's Real Goal In Iraq." 29 Sept 2002. Information Clearing House. 24 Apr. 2006. < www.information clearing house.inf/article2319.htm>
Browne, Harry. "What Can We Learn From World War II." 14 Nov, 2002. World Daily News. 20 Apr. 2006. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?Article_ID=29660.
Burroughs,William. ("Quotations"). 1996. The Columbia World of Quotations. 30 March 2006. http://bartley.com/66/64/9364.html.
"Economic Benefits of War." Agnoticism/Atheism. 24 Apr 2006. http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/phil/blphil_et_wardef_soc.htm
Henslin, James. Social Problems. Upper Sattle River: Prentice Hall. 2003. Sixth Edition
"Holy Wars." BBC: Religion snd Ethics. 6 Apr 2006. http://www.bbc.co.uk//religion/ethics/war/holywar.shtml
"How To Win A Pro-War Argument." Irregulartimes. 20 Apr 2006. <www.irregulartimes.com/howtowin.html>
"Is Bush's War On Evildoers A Holy Crusade?" Irregular Times. 27 Apr. 2006. <irregularities.com/holywariorbush.com.>
Moffat, Michael. "Are Wars Good For The Economy?" About Economics. 24 Apr 2006. http://economics.about.com/cs/macroeconomis/aa032003a.htm
Mussolini, Mussolini. "Quotations." 1996. The Columbia World of Quotations. 30 March 2006. http://www.bartley.com/66/3/41003.html.
.
Phillips. Kevin. "How the GOP Became God's Own Party." 2 Apr. 2006, washingtonpost.com 6 Apr. 2006. http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006./04/01/AR2006040100004_pf.html.
"War." Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy. 26 Apr. 2006. <http:plato.stanford.edu/entries/war/>
War As Bad And Harmful
These arguments explain why war is bad and horrible. The student of peace presents the arguments and the sage teacher of peace amplifies with insight and wise comments. These arguments offer a unique perspective on the horror and pointlessness of human warfare.
"War as Evil" Argument
War As Man's Devil

Source: "Is Wal-Mart Evil? The War Against" Google Images. www.nationalsurvey.com
Student of Peace: War is evil because it produces sorrow, distress, calamity,
destruction, injury, and death. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, President of the
United States during World War Two, exclaimed, "I have seen war. I have
seen war on land and sea. I have seen blood in the mud. I have seen cities destroyed.
I have seen children starving. I have seen the agony of mothers and wives. I
hate war" ("Wikiquote"). Freud, the Austrian psychiatrist and
founder of psychotherapy, viewed war as evil for these reasons. War is ferocity,
cruelty, and blind fury. It brings about horrible consequences. War wastes large
amounts of money on terrible weapons. During the war people lose their sense
of good will. An outcome is bitterness for combatants, civilians, and vanquished
("War and Peace" 1012).
Sage Teacher of Peace: Please comment.
"War Manifests Moral Vices" Argument
Student: A vice is a flaw and a serious defect in character or behavior that
produces harmful and destructive results. War exhibits these moral vices: (1)
Hatred and bigotry are shown toward the enemy. The foes may be hated because
they have a different skin color, speak a different language, or worship another
God. (2) Greed is a reprehensible acquisitiveness to obtain the wealth and property
of the enemy which escalates into violence and war. (3) Revenge is vengeance
toward a group or nation for a past injury or offense. The aggressor seeks to
punish and harm the enemy ("War Is Evil").
Dehumanization is another vice. These characteristics are realities of dehumanization
of modern warfare: (1) The enemy is deprived of human qualities and one sees
the enemy as the embodiment of evil and oneself as the highest good. (Hanslin
523) In the current Iraqi War, President Bush pictures America as the highest
good that is fighting for democracy and freedom, while radical Islam is a terrible
evil that seeks to bring its form to the whole world and totalitarianism (2)
The mass media presents the enemy as barbaric, a threat to one's nation, and
as inferior ; (3) The aggressor sees itself as the victim, as the one oppressed,
fighting the demonic enemy and uses scapegoats ("Dehumanization");
(4) Both sides murder and torture without heart. They also lose a sense of humanized
morality and compassion for the enemy (Hanslin 523).
Sage Teacher: Yes, war is a vice, but whose vice is it? If we first point the
finger at "them" (the warmongers), aren't we also at war? Concern
over dehumanization is a highly conscious point of view. The big question is
"How does war make for this type of consciousness?" Please add more
to the comment.
"Danger of Nuclear War" Argument

Source: "Nuclear War" Google Images" www.eurekacouncil.com
Student: The world is in grave danger because of nuclear weapons. A nuclear
weapons accident could injure and kill many people. A limited nuclear war could
harm soldiers and civilians of a nation. A World War Three nuclear war may kill
most of the human race and devastate our planet (Henslin 517). Physicans Against
Nuclear Weapons state, "Nuclear weapons are not like any other weapons
- there is no other weapon that can kill hundreds of millions and possibly bring
the end of human civilization" . The nuclear arms race reached its peak
in 1986. The United States and Soviet Union, the two super powers of the Cold
War, possessed 68,000 nuclear weapons that could extinguish the population of
25 Earths ("Learn About Nuclear Weapons"with nuclear warheads proliferated
to eight.
Nation Estimated Nuclear Warheads
United States 7000
Russia 6000
France 464
China 400
United Kingdom 186
Israel 200 to 400
India 75-150
Pakistan 15-25
(Moore)
Sage Teacher: The world is, indeed, in great danger, because of nuclear weapons - and viruses, pollution, over-population, and resource depletion. Please add more to the comment.
"War Is Anti-religious from the Buddhist
Perspective" Argument
"Cultivating Peace, Dismantling War"

Source: "Cultivating Peace, Dismantling War." Yahoo Image. newsspirithit.com
Student: Stephen and Bartholomew Klick in the article, "The Evils of War,"
argue war is evil from the Buddhist viewpoint. These four reasons are presented.
The first reason is war is the opposite of religions that teach compassion,
love, and non-violence. The Buddhists believe war brings about negative karma
and suffering and misery for many people. The second is every cause produces
a complimentary effect. Violence of war, in turn, produces aggression, hostility,
ferocity, and brutality in society. The third is war and violence may destroy
one's civilization. The fourth reason is war and violence degrade its practioners
to vicious animals and is dangerous to human survival and well-being.
Sage Teacher: Buddhist Philosophy has always seen clearly. It demonstrates compassion,
thus, takes responsibility for the problem. Please add more to the comment.
"Sociological Conflict Theorists Explain
Dangers of War" Argument
Student: Sociologist who promote conflict identify these perils of war.
The first danger is the struggle over resources. Human groups contend over scarce resources and seek to expand their power. They engage with each other and sometimes employ war.
Blood for Oil

Source: "I Want Your Blood for Oi" Yahoo Image. youmakemewanttdie.com
The second danger is the called the "conflicting interests of the bourgeoisie" Henslin explains these conflicts:
In each society some group takes control. This group, which they call the bourgeoisie, uses the resources of society to keep itself in power and to exploit the powerless. As the bourgeoisie expand their power beyond their country, they come into conflict with one another. As a result they decide to go to war. The bourgeoisie don't fight, of course. They hold the power, so they send the exploited (the poor, the workers, the proletariat) to battle for them. The German term for the young men of the poor who died in such outrageous numbers in their wars is "cannon fodder."
Bourgoisie In Conflict

Source: Pub Boor or Bourgoisie" Google Image. www.cnnsi.com
The third danger is imperialism. Capitalist nations seek to expand their markets
and invest their surplus capital. John Flynn, a writer of the liberal journal,
explains, "Imperialism is an institution under which one nation asserts
the right to seize the land or at least to control the government or resources
of another people" ("Quotes On War").
Carol Moore, a writer and peace activist, views the Bush Administration as the
"triumph of Neoconservative imperialists." These are the reasons;
First, the Bush Administration will use all means to keep the United States
the dominant superpower and use preemptive war and even nuclear weapons, and
seeks to promote its military superiority. Second, the United States represents
Israeli interests in the Middle East. It seeks to defeat nations of the Middle
East that challenge United States and Israel dominance. These nations include
Saddam Hussein's Iraq, Iran, and Syria. Third, the Bush Administration seeks
to prevent China from becoming the prominent power in the Asia-Pacific Region.
Fourth, the United States leads the war against terrorism and al Qaeda. Fifth,
the United States seeks to promote its values of democracy, freedom, and free
trade. It seeks regime change for nations that do not accept these values. Sixth,
the United States has fought two war, Afghanistan and Iraq, to show the world
it means to be the dominant world power. Seventh, the Bush Adminstration builds
a large military force and machine to maintain its politicial, military, and
economic dominance and superiority to any challenger.
Imperialism

Source: "IMPPERIALISM" Google Image. www.socialistviewpoint.org

Source: "Imperialism" Google Image. www,redness.jpg
.
The fourth danger is the war machine that is composed of a large armed forces,
the elite of the military, political leaders, and upper level business executuves,
and large expenditures for the military and wars. In the United States the war
machine is called Military-Industrial Complex. It is composed of an elite with
merged interests. Military elite want a big military because it enhances the
power and prestige of the military. It needs enemies to justify the existence
of the military. The business elite persuade the politicians to go to war and
conquer other countries. The business elite seek to promote and protect its
own interests and investments around the world and at home. The political leaders
need corporate funding to win elections. They use national security as a justification
for a large American war machine. The military-industrial complex is a powerful
interest group that seeks to produce armaments, promotes arm races, desires
large profits, and needs hostile enemies. The arms industries specialize in
armaments such as missles, tanks, and airplanes. According to conflict theory
the purpose of this complex is to protect and expand free enterprise abroad
and at home.(Hanslin 517)
Military Industrial Comlex

Source: "military-industrial complex $15.000" Google
Image. www.wilpf.org
Sage Teacher: Please recomment
.
"Tragic Human Nature" Argument
Tragedy of Human Nature

Source: Mass Graves of Massacre Victims." Google Image" www.centurychina.com
Student: The basic belief that war is ingrained in human nature, is held by
pessimistic intellectuals. Thomas Hobbes, British philosopher, argued that the
state of man's nature is war, and every man is at war with other men. Plato,
the ancient Greek philosopher, claimed that war is the result of man's appetites
and impulses. This impulse overwhelms reason. Freud, the Austrian psychiatrist,
believed that war was caused by the thanatos - the aggressive, destructive,
and death instinct of humans. Dostoyevsky, the Russian writer, believed man's
nature is barbaric. He/she is a beast of rage, vice, aggression, and mental
diseases ("Philosophy of War").
Sage Teacher: Pessimistic as it might sound doesn't history bear this out, but
the idea that war is ingrained in human nature? Please recomment.
"Psychological Harm of War" Argument

Source: "Pscholocical Harm" Google Images. btsd.K12.wi.us
Student: These psychological effects are the results of war:
First is post dramatic stress disorder that applies to veterans and civilians. Some events that cause this effect are witnessing killing in combat and captivity in concentration camps and prisoner of war camps. Some experiences include trauma in dreams, recurring images of the events, and the loss of desire to participate in daily activities. One is filled with negative emotions such as guilt, depression, and fear (Lauer 533).
Second is lasting feelings of hate, fear, suspicion, and guilt.
Third is post war drug addiction.
Fourth is committing violent acts in civilian life.
According to the sage teacher, these symptoms are indicative of the battered
child syndrome.
Sage Teacher: Please recomment.
"The High Cost of War" Argument

"Source: War With Iraq America" Google Image. www.csmonitor.com
Student: The cost of war is enormous.
United States expenditure for these wars: Dollars at time of war
War of 1812 $615 million
Mexican War $ 1.1 billion
American Revolution $ 1.9 billion
Spanish-American War $ 6 billion
Civil War $ 46 billion
Korean War $ 262 billion
World War One $ 370 billion
Vietnam War $ 553 billion
World War Two $ 3 trillion
Henslin (519)
According to the National Priority Project the cost of the current Iraqi War
based on Congressional appropriations is about $271 billion ("Wow!"
- a comment of the sage teacher) as of April 3, 2006. These expenditures include
military operations, reconstruction, and other expenditures for the invasion
and occupation of Iraq.
Sage Teacher: Astonishing numbers. It is interesting that the Civil War and
World War Two show some parallels in numbers? What do you make of it? (Please
add more).
"Human Death and Injury" Argument
Student: War brings about great human destruction. Since the end of World War Two and 1997, 135 wars on earth killed more than 22 million people. This table shows the enormous deaths and wounded in five American wars
|
War
|
Battle Deaths | Non-battlle Deaths | Wounded |
| Civil War | 215,000 | 283,000 | 282,000 |
| Word War One | 53,000 | 63,000 | 204,000 |
World War Two 292,000 115,000 671,000
Korea 34,000 21,000 103,000
Vietnam 47,000 10,000 304,000
(Lauer 510)
Sage Teacher: Please recomment
"Destructive Attiudes Justify War and Militarism" Argument
These attitudes occur on the both sides of the war and encouraged by all leaders.
The concept is called international misperception in which these attitudes justify
both war and militarism. R.P. Whites identifies six misperceptions in wars:
(Direct Quote)
1. The diabolical-enemy image imputes flagrant evil to the enemy who is conceived
to be thoroughly criminal in be thoroughly criminal in behavior. Prior to the
war against Iraq, our political leaders "indulged in personal name calling,
false analogies, to past wars and demonic leaders of earlier times (Mark and
Rubin 1991). When the enemy is portrayed in such diabolic terms, virtually any
kind of offensive action - even genocide - may be considered legitimate (Gamson
1995).
2. The virile self-image implies preoccupation with one's strength and courage
and the need to avoid humiliation by determined fighting.
3. The moral self-image affirms goodness; we are the people of God and the enemy
is the devil.
4. Selective inattention means that only the worst aspects of the enemy are
noticed, at the same time we attend to the best aspect of ourselves, reinforcing
the idea the idea of the war, as a conflict conflict between black and white,
good and bad.
5. Absence of empathy means the inability to understand how the situation looks
from the other's viewpoint.
6. Military overconfidence refers to the conviction that our side can win (Lauer
550).
Sage Teacher: All misperceptions is a residue of thought, opinion, and/or emotion being intermingled with the perception. The lense becomes colored by thought and opinion. This is the case at both the individual and collective level.
"Preventive or Preemptive War A Danger to Freedom" Argument
Student: A preemptive war is justified by an imminent threat of attack. Since
the 911 attack on its soil the United States has instituted Homeland Security
and the Patriot Act and claims to currently be fighting a preemptive war in
Iraq. I have spoken to several people who told me that they fear to express
their true views, are cautious on using the American right of free speech, and
see the suppression of civil liberties. Freedom is the right to speak and act
without fear and external restraint and interference.
J. William Fulbright, United States Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee and an opponent of the Vietnam War, warned, "A preventive war
in defense of freedom would surely destroy freedom, because one cannot engage
in barbarous action without becoming a barbarian, because one cannot defend
human values by calculated and unprovoked violence without doing moral damage
to the values one is trying to defend" (Wikiquote).
Sage Teacher: Please recomment
"War Crimes" Argument
Student: War crimes are considered crimes against humanity and the gravest
offenses against international law. They are so serious that there is no time
limit for persecution and punishment by the International Court. If the nation
loses the war, people are usually tried for war crimes.
War crimes are of three types: First is crimes against peace such as waging
a war of aggression or war in violation of international law. Second is crimes
against humanity that include atrocities and offences against civilian populations
during war such as murder, extermination, and deportation. Third is violation
of laws and customs of war that include ill treatment of prisoners of war, wantron
destruction of cities, and torture and biological experiments ("The Ethics
of War").
War crimes are taking place in our life time. International Relations Center,
a think tank for peace, claims the Bush Administration is committing war crimes
in Iraq. They charge that "despite massive cover-ups, the evidence is emerging:
the Bush Administration planned an illegal war of aggression against Iraq, conned
the American people and their representatives into supporting it, conducted
an illegal occupation marked by massive violations of Iraqi human rights, and
justified and promoted systematic torture." The Bush Administration also
uses threats to employ death squads and nuclear weapons against its enemies.
"These acts violate American law, International Law, and the basic values
of the American people. They are crimes against peace and crimes against humanity"
(Brecher and Smith).
Sage Teacher: Please recomment
No matter who wins the current war, we all lose. These arguments question the rationality and real purposes of war.
Works Citied
Cost of War." National Priority Project. 3 Apr. 2006. <"http://cost
of war.com/index.html">
"Dehumanization" Wikipededia. 27 Mar. 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dehumanization
"The Ethics of War." BBC.Co.UK. 4 Apr. 2006. <"http://www.bbcco.uk/religion/ethics/war/warcrimes.shtml">
Flynn, John. "Quotes On War." Mark Velenti's Liberty Page. 24 Apr. 2006 www.angelfire.com/pa/segerman/quote/war.html
Freud, Sigmund. "Why War?" Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies. Ed: David Barash. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 9-13.
Henslin, James. Social Problems. Upper Sattle River: Prentice Hall. 2003. Sixth
Edition. p. 612.
Klick, Stephen and Klick, Bartholomew. "The Evils of War." Buddhist
Information. 27 Feb. 2006. <http://www.buddhistinformation.com/evils_of _war.htm>
Lauer, Robert. Social Problems And The Quality of Life. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
1998. 697.
"Learn About Nuclear Weapons." Swedish Peace And Arbitration Society.
24 April 2006. <ww.slmk.org/learn>
Moore, Carol. "Is Nuclear War Inevitable?" Carol Moore. Net 26 Apr
2006. www.carolmore.net
"The Philosophy of War." The Internet Philosophy of War. 23 Feb. 2003.
http:www.utm.edu./research/iep/w/war.htm
"War." Wikiquote. 21 Mar. 2006. <"http: en.wikiquote.org/wiki/War">
"War is Evil" War is Evil.org. 14 Mar 2006. http//www.warisevil.org./
Understanding Two Approaches
to Peace:
Negative Peace and Positive Peace
A Lover of Peace

Source: "Peacesymbol.jpg" Yahoo Images. www.viewfrommywindow..net.
Johan Galtung invented two concepts of peace: negative peace and positive peace.
Galtung was born in Oslo, Norway on October 24, 1930. He is a Norwegian professor
who is an academic and a pioneer of peace and conflict research. These two concepts
are examined in this paper.
Negative Peace

Source: "Peace & Justice. October 2001" Yahoo Internet. www.stantousconnection.org.
Negative peace is a state of affairs in the international system where nations and political groups seek to prevent and to limit war and violence. Negative peace seeks to manage violence between individuals, groups, and nations. Its strategy is disassociation that involves separating the parties in conflict, if necessary with force.. It works with a dangerous world of mutual hostility, enemies ,and national antagonism. ("The Nature of Peace and Its Implications for Peace Education"). It addresses these concerns: (1) urgent conditions and violence of war, and (2) the utilization and consequences of force, and weapons ("What Is Peace?"). It seeks to control agitators from creating disturbances and examines ways to suppress existing violent disturbances ("Peace"). The major characteristics of negative peace include absence of violence, pessimistic outlook about human nature and believe aggression and misunderstandings are part of international politics. It also is curative that is the use of remedial treatment to prevent war, and is not always the use of peaceful methods and even includes violence and war (Grewal). It seeks to avoid violence between states and civil wars within nations. In this negative peace era the planet is filled with local conflicts such as Iraq and Afghanistan, and the Palestinian - Israeli conflict. Millions are threatened by war. The nations seek a balance of power in the international field to maintain the status quo and prevent war. The majority of people and politicians believe in non-violent peace. ("PeaceBuilding").
The following methods are employed in negative peace:
1. Crisis management seeks to stop crisis that threatensa world nuclear war. An example is the Cuba - USA confrontation of 1961 ("What Is Peace?").
2. Preventive diplomacy uses diplomacy to bring about negotiated settlements.
3. Peacekeeping is the use of legitimate, international military coalitions with the consent of belligerent parties to implement conflict prevention and assist in humanitarian operations ("Peace Operations").
These consequences flow from negative peace. First, Gordon Bennet, a Christian
nonviolent peace activist, explains, "Peace activists [are] often trapped
in an endless cycle of reaction and response, trying to stop the war, the new
missile, this senseless military expenditure. Often, [they] become exhausted,
fighting so many battles on so many fronts, that (they) have little time or
energy left to plan or propose long-term peace-building, initiatives."
Second, the enemies of peace exist in the negative peace environment and include
greed, jealousy, anger, pride, and egotism. Third, the environment is filled
with competing ideologies that claim that they are roads to peace, prosperity,happiness,
and abudance. These ideologies include totalitarian socialism, radical Islam,
and democracy. Despite aggressive bragging and propaganda the world is filled
with violent conflict and discord. These "isms" foster more problems
and quarrels (Sri Swami Sivananda). Fourth, people minds in negative peace are
filled with fear of war, worry and anguish.
.The current world seeks to manage an unstable, negative peace. Can this situation
be changed?
Positive Peace

Source: "Peace." Yahoo Images. www.lebanonk12.US
Positive peace seeks to eliminate the real causes of war, violence, and injustice and build a world without war and violence. "It is the presence of social justice through equal opportunity, a fair distribution of power and resources, equal protection and impartial enforcement of the law" ("What Is Peace?"). In society its people are mutually supporting each other and achieving their potential. ("History:Peace"). War and violence will be abolished, and the people of earth will love and embrace positive peace.
These characteristics are manifested in a positive peace world: (1) systems
are just and democratic; (2) poor nations are given generous aid for development;
(3) basic needs of food, clothing, transportation and housing are available
to all people, (4) prosperity and good employment with adequate wages and benefits"
(5) substantial progress in health and education (Bennett), (6) unity and diversity
and pluralism are honored in the world; (7) all military technology and forces
are controlled by the United Nations; (8)concerned people visualize visions
of holistic peace paradigms and work to implement them; ((9) People seek to
be in harmony and create a wonderful Gaia or earth environment ("PeaceBuilding")
Mental state of peace exist within the mind and the pure heart of most of the people. The public is filled with silence, harmony, calm, and repose and experience happiness, joy, and bliss most of the time. Both war and violence are perceived as a disgrace (Sri Swami Sivanda).
The article" What Is Peace" lists these methods for promoting positive peace:
1. Establishing peace through world order by supporting international law,
compliance with multilateral treaties, use of international courts, and nonviolent
resolution, participation in international organizations, trade, and communication.
2. Establishing social equality and justice, ecological balance, protecting
citizens from attack, and meeting human needs.
3. Establishing a civil peace that provides the constitutional and legal means
necessary to settle disputes nonviolently.
4. Eliminating indirect violence, that shortens the life span of people, sustains
unequal life chances, or reduces the quality of life for any citizen.
5. Practicing conflict resolution as a foundation for building interpersonal
and institutional relationships.
My hypothesis is mankind is in transformation from the Mental Rational Era to
the Integrative Era. (Kealey. Lecture Notes . 23 Jan. 2006). The mental -rational
era lasted from about 500 B.C to the present. Its characteristics were numerous
wars and using negative peace to prevent these wars from producing total destructive
to the planet. The planet is in now in transformation to the Integral Era. I
believe it will be an era of unity and oneness consciousness, positive peace
with no wars, and a new golden age. My evidence is twofold. First are channeling
from Adama who predicts Mount Shasta will be the first light city on the surface
of our planet and that mankind will be living in the fifth dimension of love,
wisdom, and compassion. Positive peace will prevail. Many New Agers believe
the new millennium will bring forth a new golden age for our planet with outer
and inner peace.
The great challenge for advocates of peace is to transform the world from a
dangerous negative peace to a flourishing positive peace. The big question is
can this situation actually happen and how to bring it into being. What is your
vision of positive peace? What role you can play to make positive peace a living
reality?
Quotes on Negative Peace:
Dorothy Thompson, an American writer, pictures negative peace, "They have not wanted Peace at all: they have wanted to be spared war - as though the absence of war was the same as peace." ("Peace Quotes" ).
Eramus, a philosopher, stated, "The most disadvantaged peace is better than the most just war." ("Quotes for Peace").
Cicero, the Roman philosopher, said, "I prefer the most unfair peace to the most righteous war" ("Quotes For Peace")
Quotes on Positive Peace
John Lemon, a Beatte, sang
Imagine all the people living in peace
You may say I'm a dreamer
but I am not the only one.
I hope someday you'll join us,
and the world will be as one.
("Quotes For Peace")
T. Tostle in his Personal Correspondence, stated, "(Peace) is a state of well-being that is characterized by trust, compassion, and justice. In this state, we can be encouraged to explore as well as celebrate our diversity, and search for the good in each other the concern for personal pain and sacrifice It provides us a chance to look at ourselves and others as part of the human family, part of one world" (Sandy and Perkins)
Famous quote by the philosopher Baruch Spinoza states, "Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice" ("History:Peace" )
Works Cited
Bennett, Gordon. "From Negative to Positive Peacemaking." 3 Nov 2003. CommonDreams.org. 1 May 2006. http://www.commondreams.org/scripfiles/views/1103-03.htm.
Grewal, Baljit. "Positive and Negative Peace." Bajit.blogspot.com 10 Apr 2006. http://baljit.blogs.com/2005/08positive-and-negative-peace.html
"History: Peace." Conflictresolver.Net. 10 Apr. 2006. http://www.conflictresolver.net/tiki-pagehistory.php?page+peace&diff2=4&diff_style=sideviews&PHPSEss
Kealey, D. Alexander. "Lecture Notes." College of the Siskiyous.
Weed, Ca
23 Jan 2006.
"Peace." Wikipedia. 10 Apr 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki?Peace.
"PeaceBuilding" UMW.edu 10 Apr 2006. http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/Peace.peenew.htm
"Peace Operations: An Australian Perspective. AUFPHC. 10 Apr 2006. http://www.defence.gov.au/adfwc/peacekeeping/terminology.htm
"Peace Quotes." From Wisdom Quotes 2 May 2006. http://www.wisdomquotes/cat-peace.htm
"Quotes For Peace"15 Nov 2004. Idealist.org. 2 May 2006. http://www.idealist.org
Sandy, Leo and Perkins, Ray. "The Nature of Peace And Its Implications
For Peace Education." OZ.Plymouth.edu 10 Apr 2006. http://oz.plymouth.edu/`Isandy/peacedef.html
Sri Swami Sivananda. "Peace." Sivanandalshq.org 12 Apr 2006. http://www.sivanandadshq.org/messages/peace.htm
"What Is Peace?" Esrnational,org. 10 Apr 2006. http://www.estrnational.org/peacewhatis.htm